mrralphworld.blogspot.com is a blogspot own by a young vibrant business specialist (Mr Raphael abbey babalola C.E.O.OF VIRGOWORLD VENTURE ) having passion for business growth with his social media activities in helping companies to generate traffic,sales leads,product awareness,and campaign.
for more info contact my bbm pin:5bf98473
Family Feud
has seen a lot of ridiculous guesses in its run with Steve Harvey as
host, but Sheila of the Patterson family has to be the worst guesser in
the entire history of the show. The category was other ways to say
“mother.” Sheila’s teammate Cecilia guessed “nana” which wasn’t on the
board. So Sheila guessed … “nana.” As the crowd started to applaud,
Harvey shouted, “Stop clapping. What, is you trying to say it in Spanish
or something?” “Madre,” the Spanish word for “mother,” would’ve been
better than “nana” because, again, “nana” had already been guessed. As
had “mommy,” but that didn’t stop Sheila.
“OK,
Sheila,” Harvey tried again. “Tell me another way people say ‘mother.’”
After thinking about it, Sheila guessed, “What about ‘Mommy’?” “Let me
ask y’all something. Y’all crazy?” Steve asked while the audience
laughed. “Tell me another way people say ‘mother,’” Harvey tried yet
again. “What about ‘Mommy’?” Sheila guessed yet again.
Fortunately,
Sheila learned her lesson. Just kidding. She totally didn’t learn her
lesson. “Tell me another way you say ‘mother,’” Harvey all but begged.
“Well, Steve, I would say ‘mom,’” said Sheila. “But ‘mom’ is already up
there.” And indeed it was
(Boston) – If you’ve been to GNC, you’ve probably seen
it. In between the rows of powders and pills, there’s a secure
plexiglass ‘safe,’ with only a few boxes locked inside. Out of the tens
of thousands of products sold by the nutrition giant, one
muscle-building supplement, called VolcaNO, sits locked away and out of
reach. There must be a reason?
And here’s something else that’s puzzling. Because we all like to
touch and feel what we buy, you would think VolcaNO sales might be few
and far between. Surprisingly, even though it’s out of immediate reach,
VolcaNO has turned into one of GNC’s most promising products in a very
short time. People obviously want what’s behind the glass. Why Does VolcaNO Need Special Protection?
“It’s human nature,” says the Chief Marketing Officer of Force
Factor. “People tend to crave what works and what’s in high demand,” he
explained. “That’s why VolcaNO is kept apart from the rest of the pack.
And even though we regret that customers don’t have hands-on access, in
an odd way I guess we should be flattered. VolcaNO has such a cult-like
reputation, particularly among serious athletes, that some guys can’t
keep their hands off of it.”
VolcaNO is a different breed… a vein-annihilating formula that’s way
beyond single-action nitric oxide boosters. It starts with high quality
L-citrulline for an explosive NOx boost. Then adds a highly concentrated
creatine HCL for superior micro-dosing and amazing strength. Finally,
there’s agmatine to tie it all together into one very smart, very
serious muscle– building powerhouse.
Within a short amount of time, men who had taken VolcaNO reported feeling:
Amplified energy and long-lasting pumps
Incredible muscle gains
Drastic increases in strength
Faster recovery
Total body transformation
The makers of VolcaNO are so confident in their new product they are offering every man in the country a free sample. If you’re interested in giving it a shot, claim a sample here. If you are not able to find a bottle online, you may be able to find VolcaNO at your local GNC…. but under lock and key.
P.S. Next time you find yourself at a GNC, ask about VolcaNO Fury,
Force Factor’s brand new pre-workout which readers report stacks
incredibly well with the VolcaNO capsules you can try here.
Fury features what Force Factor is calling the “Liquid Laser Energy
Blend,” which promises serious energy and intense focus to dominate your
workouts from beginning to end. (We can see how this would pair well
with VolcaNO’s strength and power blends.)
After
deciding to boycott Thursday’s GOP debate held by Fox News because he
felt that moderator Megyn Kelly is biased against him, Donald Trump
hosted what he called a “Special Event for Veterans” that looked and
sounded a lot like a campaign rally. Special guests included fellow GOP
presidential candidates Rick Santorum, Mike Huckabee, and Trump’s
pregnant daughter, Ivanka Trump, to whom he said “Ivanka, it would be so
great if you had your baby in Iowa. It would be so great. I’d
definitely win. Stand up, honey, say hello.” He also invited an actual
veteran to speak at the event, retired Sgt. John Wayne Walding, who
said, “My name is John Wayne Walding. I’m a green beret from Groesbeck,
Texas, born on the fourth of July, so you’re welcome for that, America.”
The
event had everything you’d expect from a Trump rally: lots of mentions
of making America great again, how much money was raised (nearly $6
million by the end of the evening), screaming protesters, and lots of
chants of both “Trump! Trump! Trump!” and “USA! USA! USA!”
And if you missed it, check out Bill O’Reilly’s desperate plea to Trump to reconsider bailing on the debate
Megyn Kelly took time on The Kelly File
Tuesday to address Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s
recent decision to skip the next GOP debate because of her presence as a
moderator.
Trump
alleges that Kelly was unfair in her questioning of him in the last Fox
News-hosted debate in August. Kelly forcefully maintained her stance —
that she’s simply a journalist asking the difficult questions that need
to be asked. “In the months since, Mr. Trump has repeatedly brought up
that exchange as evidence of alleged bias on my part,” Kelly said
directly to her viewers. “I maintain it was a tough but fair question,
and we agreed to disagree.”
Later,
Kelly, alongside fellow Fox News personality Britt Hume, theorized this
is all about control. “Trump is not used to not controlling things as
the chief executive of a large organization, but the truth is, he
doesn’t get to control the media,” she said. “And while he’s made his
position on me clear after that first debate, Roger Ailes has made his
position clear too.”
In a statement released Tuesday, Fox News wrote the following:
“As
many of our viewers know, Fox News is hosting a sanctioned debate in
Des Moines, Iowa, on Thursday night, three days before the first votes
of the 2016 election are cast in the Iowa Caucus. Donald Trump is
refusing to debate seven of his fellow presidential candidates on stage
that night, which is near unprecedented. We’re not sure how Iowans are
going to feel about him walking away from them at the last minute, but
it should be clear to the American public by now that this is rooted in
one thing — Megyn Kelly, whom he has viciously attacked since August and
has now spent four days demanding be removed from the debate stage.
Capitulating to politicians’ ultimatums about a debate moderator
violates all journalistic standards, as do threats, including the one
leveled by Trump’s campaign manager Corey Lewandowski toward Megyn
Kelly. In a call on Saturday with a Fox News executive, Lewandowski
stated that Megyn had a ‘rough couple of days after that last debate’
and he ‘would hate to have her go through that again.’ Lewandowski was
warned not to level any more threats, but he continued to do so. We
can’t give in to terrorizations toward any of our employees. Trump is
still welcome at Thursday night’s debate and will be treated fairly,
just as he has been during his 132 appearances on Fox News & Fox
Business, but he can’t dictate the moderators or the questions.”
Trump
responded to that statement by tweeting: “The statement put out
yesterday by @FoxNews was a disgrace to good broadcasting and
journalism. Who would ever say something so nasty & dumb.” He added:
“I refuse to call Megyn Kelly a bimbo, because that would not be
politically correct. Instead I will only call her a lightweight
reporter!”
In an interview with Entertainment Tonight,
Kelly said she thinks it’s possible he will show up. This was before
Trump’s campaign insisted again he won’t, however. “I’ll be surprised if
he doesn’t come,” Kelly told Jen Peros. “I know he says he doesn’t want
to now, but I’ll really be surprised because I feel like the people of
Iowa are still persuadable. He’s in a tight race with Ted Cruz. I don’t
know why he wouldn’t take one last opportunity to make his case to them
in such a huge forum.
Don’t walk away from it!” yelled Bill O’Reilly to Donald Trump on Wednesday night’s O’Reilly Factor
on Fox News. O’Reilly scolded, cajoled, and very nearly begged Trump to
reconsider his decision to spurn Thursday’s Fox-sponsored debate
because of the candidate’s hurt feelings regarding moderator Megyn Kelly’s previous inquisition of the presidential candidate.
“I
don’t like being used,” said Trump regarding Kelly. “She’s a
lightweight … I have zero respect for Megyn Kelly.” “And anyway,” Trump
added, “it’s not that important.” O’Reilly tried a number of tactics:
Religion:
O’Reilly said, “I know you don’t go to church very often—” “Not true!”
yelped Trump, seeing Evangelical Christian votes slipping away even as
O’Reilly formed the words. “Maybe I don’t go every week, but…” O’Reilly
told Trump that one of the “tenets of your church is forgiveness,” so
why not forgive Kelly and show up? “I guess so,” said Trump, “but it’s
also called an eye for an eye, too.” Ooh, a New Testament vs. Old
Testament throwdown!
Shame:
O’Reilly said Trump was shirking his responsibility to “the folks”
(translation: that’s O’Reilly-speak for “ordinary people” — i.e.,
voters) by “walking away” from the debate. “I’m not walking away — I was
pushed away,” snapped Trump. This man really feels abused by Megyn.
Brutal Realism:
O’Reilly told Trump that when he first entered the race, “people
thought you were a buffoon,” but that he’d proven them wrong. Trump
hated that. “That’s not a very nice way of expressing it!” he bellowed,
clearly stung by the word “buffoon.” “I’m a very successful businessman,
I had one of the most popular shows on TV…” Bill was getting nowhere.
He was desperate.
“Would
you just consider [it]; say, ‘I might come’?” O’Reilly asked. There was
also something in there about how, having known each other for 35
years, Trump owed Bill a lot of milkshakes (huh?). Couldn’t Trump “forgive” Kelly, and “go forward”?
Trump
then said something few people reveal on television: “Even though you
promised not to ask that, I’m gonna forget it and answer you.” The
answer was no.
O’Reilly
became a tad flustered, allowing that, yes, he may have promised Trump
not to ask a certain question before they went on-camera, but, mustering
his bluster, the host said that no one tells him what questions to ask.
All
to no avail. I picture O’Reilly, when the little red camera light went
off, ripping his lapel microphone off and thundering, “Well, Roger
Ailes, I tried!”
Indeed,
he did. And you know what? If I was a betting man, I’d bet that there
is still a chance that Trump will reconsider, that he just might show up
on Thursday night anyway.
Pope
Francis' sex abuse advisory committee has voted to temporarily sideline
one of its members, a high-profile abuse survivor who had clashed with
the commission over its mission
.
View photo
Peter Saunders, a British
advocate for survivors, talks during an interview with the Associated
Press in Rome, Saturday, Feb. 6, 2016. Pope Francis’ sex abuse advisory
committee voted Saturday to temporarily sideline one of its members, a
high-profile abuse survivor who had clashed with the commission over its
mandate and mission. During a meeting of the commission Saturday, "it
was decided that Mr. Peter Saunders would take a leave of absence from
his membership to consider how he might best support the commission's
work," the Vatican said in a statement. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)
VATICAN CITY (AP) -- Pope Francis' sex abuse
advisory committee voted Saturday to sideline one of its members, a
high-profile abuse survivor who had clashed with the commission over its
mission.
Peter
Saunders, a British advocate for victims, had been highly critical of
the Vatican's slow pace of progress in taking measures to protect
children and punish bishops who covered up for pedophile priests. He had
also wanted the commission to intervene immediately in individual
cases, rather than just craft long-term policies to fight abuse.
During
a commission meeting Saturday, "it was decided that Mr. Peter Saunders
would take a leave of absence from his membership to consider how he
might best support the commission's work," the Vatican said.
The
decision is a blow to Francis' efforts to show that he is tough on
abuse, since the presence of Saunders and another abuse survivor, Marie
Collins, had given the commission credibility.
In
an interview with The Associated Press, Saunders said commission
members, with one abstention, asked had him to step aside after
concluding they could no longer trust him to work within the scope of
the commission's mandate.
"I do not want to
prevent the work of the commission, the good work that the commission is
doing from going ahead, so I had no choice but to step aside," he said.
He
said the Vatican's inaction in the face of continuing cases of children
being raped and molested "made me lose faith in the process and lose
faith in Pope Francis."
His departure leaves
Collins as the lone abuse survivor on the commission, which was formed
in 2013 to advise the Vatican on protecting children, educating church
personnel and parishioners about abuse, and keeping pedophiles out of
the priesthood.
Collins told the AP it was a
"sad day" for the commission. She acknowledged Saunders' complaints
about the pace of work but said the overall mission was still important.
"It
is slow. It's not going to make changes overnight. And there are
frustrations in that," she said. "But if we can change policy and get
policies put in place that will stick around the world that will make
children safer in the future, then it's worth making time to get it
right."
The
commission was formed after victims' groups questioned whether the
Argentine pope, who had never dealt with an abuse case, really
understood the scope of the scandal. But the commission took a big step
last year when it successfully proposed that the Vatican create an
in-house tribunal to hear cases of bishops accused of failing to protect
their flocks.
The
commission had been highly critical of Francis' decision to appoint a
Chilean bishop despite allegations from abuse survivors that he had
covered up for the country's most notorious pedophile, the Rev. Fernando
Karadima.
One
of Karadima's victims, Juan Carlos Cruz, joined Saunders on Saturday in
Rome in hopes of speaking to the commission but was refused. Cruz had
been proposed as a possible commission member but emails published in
the Chilean media showed how the Chilean church hierarchy worked to keep
him off the panel.
